- PERFORMANCE WINDOWS 10 PRO VS WORKSTATION FOR FREE
- PERFORMANCE WINDOWS 10 PRO VS WORKSTATION WINDOWS 7
However I'd recommend hyper-v in general as you can enable virtualization based security features such as credential guard. For example hyper-v with XP will not support USB devices such as a USB to serial. Hyper-v on a client is only limited by resources.Įach hypervisor has it's pro's and cons. Also, it's got a broader base of compatibility for various distros of Linux.Ĭan anyone help me with the following questions? The host I'm running is Windows 10 Pro - I know it's a bit of a touchy subject but it is what it is.
Workstaiton offers a more streamlined experience if you're planning on doing a lot of interaction with your VMs.
PERFORMANCE WINDOWS 10 PRO VS WORKSTATION FOR FREE
VMware offers Player for free for non-production environments, but if you're using it for production, you need to pay for a license of Workstation Pro or Workstation Player. What OSes do you intend to use? Windows, Linux? What do you intend to do with the VM? A lot of interaction? Just services? Your limit will be resources, the hard limit on older versions of Hyper-V were in the ranges of 512-2048 based on version and edition, I don't believe MS publishes limits to Hyper-V for current versions.
There are threads about this, and I've explicitly asked the old MS rep here, and he confirmed VDI and SA are only necessary if you're doing remote access to client VMs. It's only when you're remotely accessing client OSes that you need to deal with VDA/VDI licensing.
PERFORMANCE WINDOWS 10 PRO VS WORKSTATION WINDOWS 7
You can virtualize desktop OSes like Windows 7 and 10 and not need a VDA license if you're accessing them directly on the same host, in other words, from the console of the hosting Windows 10 computer. Your above question assumes you are using Hyper-V this one goes against that, but use whatever you are comfortable with, Hyper-V (Type-1 Hypervisor) or VMware Workstation (type-2 hypervisor).ġ is free and there for you to use already, one costs money and is an application, however many people use VMware because of familiarity, both function the same, but somewhat differently. Which hypervisor would you recommend? Mainly I'm wondering if Hyper-V would have a less of a footprint on the host. I do not believe there is a limit, it's based on licenses of the guests, but Hyper-V on a workstation exists for dev/test use not aimed at production use, so MSDN/TechNet type use, the limit is your resources. How many Windows Hyper-V clients can run on a Windows 10 host (not resource-wise but according to MS restrictions, assuming they exist)? The host I'm running is Windows 10 Pro - I know it's a bit of a touchy subject but it is what it is.
0 kommentar(er)
